Legal Opinion

Slayton v. Shumway

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1990No. CV-90-0356-APPublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing a suit brought by Dan Richmond Slayton (Slayton) to enjoin Jim Shumway, the Secretary of State (Shumway), from certifying and printing an initiative measure on the official ballot. The initiative is designated as Proposition 104, a proposed constitutional amendment popularly known as the Victims’ Rights Initiative.

We have jurisdiction for this direct appeal under article 6, § 5(1) of the Arizona Constitution and A.R.S. § 19-122(C).

FACTS

On August 29, 1990, Slayton filed suit in the Maricopa County Superior Court…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Kerby v. LuhrsArizona Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  4. State Ex Rel. Collins v. SeidelArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Tilson v. MoffordArizona Supreme Court · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HansenArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  3. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Romley v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API