Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Pima County v. Heinfeld

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 12, 1982No. 16223-SAPublishedCited by 63 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Vice Chief Justice:

In the course of conducting a post audit of Pima County, the Arizona Auditor General requested that the County provide minutes of executive sessions of the Pima County Board of Supervisors for use in preparing the audit report. Pima County refused to turn over the minutes believing that it was prohibited by statute from doing so. The county then brought this special action. We accepted jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz. Const. Art. 6, § 5(1) to answer the question whether Pima County may lawfully provide the Auditor General with minutes of executive sessions of the Pima…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad PassengersSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Webb v. DixonArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Peabody Coal Co. v. Navajo CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Southwestern Iron & Steel Industries, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Arden-Mayfair, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF LIQ. LIC. & C.Arizona Supreme Court · 1979

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by63 opinions

  1. State v. TarangoArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Estate of Hernandez v. Bd. of RegentsArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Vo v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. Baker v. GardnerArizona Supreme Court · 1989

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API