Jones & Laughlin Steel Co. v. Abner Doble Co.
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. James M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action to recover the sum of $27,641.21, alleged to be due as the reasonable value of certain building material sold and delivered by plaintiff to the defendant at its request. The materials were to be used by the defendant in the construction of certain buildings upon its land. Plaintiff also claimed a lien therefor upon the land and build ing and certain other lien claimants were made parties defendant. The appeal is by the Abner Doble Company alone. The only dispute is in relation to the sum for which judgment was given, and the liens and the other claims are not material to our…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Sterling v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- Katz v. BedfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- L.A. Gas & Elec. Co. v. Amalgamated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1909
- City St. Improvement Co. v. KrohCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
3Cited by17 opinions
- Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Lapp-Gifford Co. v. Muscoy Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
- California Corrugated Culvert Co. v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
- Morel v. SimonianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- American Surety Company of New York v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.