Lapp-Gifford Co. v. Muscoy Water Co.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Leonard & Surr, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, and George W. Hellyer, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This cause comes here on an order of transfer following a judgment of affirmance in the district court of appeal ior the second appellate district. The facts are fully and correctly stated in the opinion of that court, and we were, at the time of ordering the transfer, and are now, of the view that there had been a correct disposition of all points presented except that relating to the plea of accord and satisfaction. We entertained some doubt on this point, but our further examination has convinced us that it, too, was rightly disposed of by the district court of appeal.
The great…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Eames Vacuum Brake Co. v. . ProsserNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Harrison v. HendersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
- Creighton v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Carlson v. SheehanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Perin v. CathcartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Potter v. Pacific Coast Lumber Co.California Supreme Court · 1951
- Conderback, Inc. v. Standard Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1966
- Coats v. General Motors Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.