Legal Opinion

Thomas Haverty Co. v. Jones

California Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1921No. L. A. No. 5711PublishedCited by 42 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying motion to set aside and enter different judgment on findings. John W. Shenk, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of- the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

The defendant appeals from the judgment and also from an order made after judgment denying his motion to set aside the judgment and render a judgment in his favor on the findings.

The complaint states a cause of action to recover the balance alleged to be due from defendant to plaintiff upon a contract for the construction of the plumbing, steam-heating, and ventilation plant in a four-story building erected by the defendant. The answer admitted the making of the contract, but denied that the same had been fully performed by the plaintiff, and also alleged that the performance was defective in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Connell v. HigginsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Handy v. BlissMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Tiffany v. Pacific Sewer Pipe Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Harlan v. StufflebeemCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Mattei v. HopperCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Collins v. Vickter Manor, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Roxana Petroleum Co. v. RiceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Kruckow v. LesserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  5. Votaw Precision Tool Co. v. Air CanadaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API