Morel v. Simonian
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
BURROUGHS, J., pro tem.
The plaintiff brought this action to recover the sum of $865.70 alleged to be the balance due on a building contract and to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on the property upon which the building was erected. The action was dismissed as to all of the defendants other than Lionie Berthe Bal Simonian. The court entered judgment in favor of the defendant and the plaintiff appeals.
It appears from the court’s findings of fact that plaintiff and defendant entered into a contract by the terms of which the plaintiff agreed that for a consideration of $2,400 he would build, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Clopton v. CloptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Jones & Laughlin Steel Co. v. Abner Doble Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- Evans v. GerkenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by10 opinions
- Muller v. MullerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Sweat v. HollisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- Avery v. Associated Seed Growers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1963
- Ensher, Alexander & Barsoom, Inc. v. EnsherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Collins v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.