Katz v. Bedford
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County, and from an order denying a • new trial. ' The facts are stated in the-opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.
This action is brought to recover for the making and laying of a cement sidewalk. The complaint is in two counts, one upon a special contract, which is set out and made a part of the complaint, the other upon a quantum meruit.
The defendants admit the execution of the contract, but deny that the work was done in the manner required and provided therein, and allege affirmatively that the work was not done in a substantial and first-class manner as agreed upon. The defendants also plead, by way of cross-complaint, the making of the same contract set out in the complaint, that the plaintiff has…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McKinney v. SpringerIndiana Supreme Court · 1851
3Cited by32 opinions
- Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Tourette v. TouretteArizona Supreme Court · 1914
- Oil Workers International Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Trapkus v. Edstrom's, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
- Waite v. Shoemaker & Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1915
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.