Perry v. Quackenbush
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the city and county of San Francisco and from an order made after judgment striking out a cost bill. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Temple, C.
This is an appeal from the judgment and upon the judgment-roll.
The complaint shows that plaintiffs own a described tract of land; that on the 21st of January, 1887, they entered into a contract with the defendant, whereby defendant agreed, in consideration of the sum of three thousand dollars, to construct and build a house on said lot. As part of said contract plaintiffs executed and delivered to defendant their promissory note for the sum *303of three thousand dollars, and a mortgage to secure the same on the described real estate. The note and mortgage are recited at length in the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crouch v. . GutmannNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Elliott v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1890
- Pico v. CuyasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Smith v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Jones v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1871
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Thomas Haverty Co. v. JonesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- United States Pipe & Foundry Co. v. City of WacoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Pippy v. WinslowOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- People v. HeckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
- Shell v. SchmidtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.