Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Bednar v. City of North Canton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1994No. 93-628PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

For the following reasons, we affirm the judgment of the court of appeals in part and reverse it in part.

R.C. 124.44 states in part:

“Whenever a vacancy occurs in the position above the rank of patrolman in a police department, * * * [and there is an eligibility] list * * * the [civil service] commission shall, where there is a vacancy, immediately certify the name of the person having the highest rating, and the appointing authority shall appoint such person within thirty days from the date of such certification.”

Bednar relies on this statute to mandate his appointment. The city contends that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State ex rel. Crockett v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Martin v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Morgan v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 1986

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Gesler v. City of Worthington Income Tax Board of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State ex rel. Meyers v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Hipp v. City of North CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Regetz v. Cleveland Civil Service CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Bednar v. N. CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API