Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Regetz v. Cleveland Civil Service Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1995No. 94-1640PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellants assert in their sole proposition of law that a municipal corporation may not vary state civil service law by delegation in its charter of authority to a civil service commission to promulgate rules, where the delegation does not clearly and expressly evince an intent to supersede state civil service law and affords the civil service commission discretion to either permit the state civil service law to control or to nullify that law by adopting a conflicting rule.

The Home Rule Amendment to the Ohio Constitution authorizes municipalities to “exercise all powers of local…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State ex rel. McArthur v. DeSouzaOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Snyder v. Board of Education of the Johnstown-Monroe Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Lightfield v. Village of Indian HillOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State Ex Rel. Ryan v. KerrOhio Supreme Court · 1932

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ryant Committee v. Lorain County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State ex rel. Hipp v. City of North CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Golem v. Village of Put-In-BayDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2002
  4. Natl. Elec. Contrs. Assn. v. MentorOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Regetz v. Cleveland Civ. Serv. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API