Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Meyers v. City of Columbus

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 8, 1995No. 94-1966PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals denied Meyers’s request for a writ of mandamus because (1) Meyers was guilty of laches in bringing the mandamus action, and (2) pursuant to the city charter, Meyers failed to establish a right to be appointed police sergeant earlier than the date he was promoted.

*605“The elements of a laches defense are (1) unreasonable delay or lapse of time in asserting a right, (2) absence of an excuse for such delay, (3) knowledge, actual or constructive, of the injury or wrong, and (4) prejudice to the other party.” State ex rel. Cater v. N. Olmsted (1994), 69 Ohio St.3d 315, 325, 631…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carter v. SchottenOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State ex rel. Chavis v. Sycamore City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State ex rel. Cater v. City of North OlmstedOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Fraternal Order of Police v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga County BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Polo v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Spencer v. East Liverpool Planning CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State ex rel. Kaylor v. BrueningOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Kildow v. EMC Mortgage Corp. (In Re Kildow)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API