Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Martin v. City of Columbus

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1979No. 78-860PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebkezze, C. J.

The issues raised in this appeal can be'phrased as fellows: (l) Does the record reflect a lack of “due diligence” on the part of appellant in attempting to secure similar employment during the period in which ■she was entitled to back wages'? (2) Assuming the facts •do reflect the requisite degree of diligence, can the amount *264to which appellant would he entitled be calculated with a sufficient degree of certainty?

At the outset, it is evident that this particular appellant has a right to pursue her remedy in the courts by means of an original action in mandamus. Since her initial discharge by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Bruce Collyer v. Gregory DarlingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. James Loudermill v. Cleveland Board of Education, Richard Donnelly v. Parma Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  3. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Crockett v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API