Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hipp v. City of North Canton

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 24, 1994No. 93-1867PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Per curiam

For the following reasons, we reverse and remand the cause to the court of appeals. Appellant argues that a court may never dismiss a complaint summarily on a matter of law. However, we approach the issue as one of abuse of discretion. In State ex rel. Pressley v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 40 O.O.2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, paragraph ten of the syllabus, we stated that on appeal we will review the judgment of the court of appeals to determine, among other things, “[wjhether on the question of the allowance or denial of the writ on the merits, the Court of Appeals abused its…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State Ex Rel. Herbert v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Snyder v. Board of Education of the Johnstown-Monroe Local School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. State ex rel. Bednar v. City of North CantonOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Solomon v. Board of Trustees of the Police & Firemen's Disability & Pension FundOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Edwards v. Toledo City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. State ex rel. Fogle v. Steiner.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API