Legal Opinion

Sorin v. Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1976No. 75-606PublishedCited by 164 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellee recognizes that the general “American rule” does not permit the prevailing party to recover' attorney fees, in the absence of statutory authorization, .as part of the costs of litigation. See Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness Society (1975), 421 U. S. 240, 44 L. Ed. 2d 141, 147 F. D. Rich Co. v. Industrial Lumber Co. (1974), 417 U. S. 116, 126. See, also, 1 Speiser, Attorneys’ Pees, Sections 12.1,12.3 (1973). This rule is followed in Ohio,.* See Shuey v. Preston (1961), 172 Ohio St. 413; State, ex rel. Michaels, v. Morse (1956), 165 Ohio St. 599; Euclid v. Vogelin, (1950),…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Columbus Finance, Inc. v. HowardOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Irving Stolberg v. Members of the Board of Trustees for the State Colleges of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  5. State ex rel. White v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by164 opinions

  1. John C. Shimman v. International Union of Operating Engineers, Local 18Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  2. Nottingdale Homeowners' Ass'n v. DarbyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Vance v. RoedersheimerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. McConnell v. Hunt Sports EnterprisesOhio Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Toledo v. Perry's Landing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983

159 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API