State ex rel. Bardo v. City of Lyndhurst
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
In order for the extraordinary writ of mandamus to issue, this court “must find that the relator has a clear legal right to the relief prayed for, that the respondent is under a clear legal duty to perform the requested act, and that relator has no plain and adequate remedy at law.” State, ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc., v. Bacon (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 42, 15 O.O. 3d 53, 399 N.E. 2d 81, paragraph one of the syllabus.
I
In this case, the determinations of relator’s right to the promotion and respondents’ duties to promote him re*108quire the resolution of a conflict between the civil service…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State ex rel. Westchester Estates, Inc. v. BaconOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State ex rel. Crockett v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
- State ex rel. Martin v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Gannon v. PerkOhio Supreme Court · 1976
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- State ex rel. Caspar v. City of DaytonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- State ex rel. Rollins v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- State ex rel. McArthur v. DeSouzaOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- State ex rel. Meyers v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1995
- Sutton v. Cleveland Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.