Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Crockett v. Robinson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 29, 1981No. 80-1691PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Per curiam

I

The first issue presented is whether relator is entitled to *365a writ of mandamus1 to compel respondents to award him back pay where he has been reinstated2 to his position with the city government, on the basis that the civil service commission failed to timely file its record with the Court of Common Pleas as mandated by R. C. 119.12.

R. C. 119.12 provides, in part, that “[w]ithin thirty days after receipt of notice of appeal from an order in any case wherein a hearing is required by sections 119.01 to 119.13 of the Revised Code, the agency shall prepare and certify to the court a complete…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. State ex rel. National City Bank v. Board of Education of Cleveland City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Monaghan v. RichleyOhio Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State ex rel. Martin v. City of ColumbusOhio Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fenske v. McGovernOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ceol v. Zion Industries, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Sharp v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1995
  4. State ex rel. Bardo v. City of LyndhurstOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State ex rel. Weiss v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1992

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API