Vail v. San Diego County
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Diego County. E. S. Torrance, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
BEITT, C.
—Plaintiff here was the duly elected, qualified, and acting county surveyor in and for the county of San Diego, for the term commencing on the first Monday after the first day of January, 1895. When his term began, the County Government Act of 1893 was in force, and by section 145 thereof, which seems to have been applicable to all the counties of the state, it was provided that: “The county surveyor shall receive ten dollars per day for all work performed." (Stats. 1893, p. 382.) This is an action to recover from said county compensation at said rate for various services rendered by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hellman v. ShoultersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Miller v. KisterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Rode v. SiebeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Jersey Maid Milk Products Co. v. BrockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Selowsky v. Superior Court of Napa CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Ruperich v. BaehrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Galeener v. HoneycuttCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
- In Re GilstrapCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.