Miller v. Kister
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment and order of the Superior Court of the county of Mono granting a peremptory writ of mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
Application for a writ of mandate to compel the county auditor of Mono County to draw a warrant on the county treasury in favor of the petitioner for the sum of $250, which he claims to be due and owing to him by the county for his salary as county clerk of the county for the month of March, 1885.
The petitioner was elected at the general election in 1884. He qualified according to law, and entered on the discharge of his official duties on the first Monday in January, 1885. From that time until the 1st of April, 1885, he received compensation for his services at the rate of $250 per month,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hi-Voltage Wire Works, Inc. v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
- Christy v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
- Longan v. County of SolanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- People ex rel. Attorney-General v. SquiresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
- Omnibus Railroad v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Webb v. AdamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- People ex rel. Daniels v. HenshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.