Galeener v. Honeycutt
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, C. J.
The court below overruled a demurrer to plaintiff’s amended petition for a writ of mandate, and defendant, declining to answer, gave judgment for plaintiff. This is an appeal from said judgment, taken to the district court of appeal of the third appellate district, and transferred to this court for determination after decision by said district court of appeal.
Practically only two questions are raised by appellant’s briefs. The facts material thereto are substantially alleged in the petition as follows: Plaintiff was elected to the office of supervisor of Madera County at the general state…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stevenson v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Harrison v. ColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
- Smith v. MathewsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- Vail v. San Diego CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Tucker v. BarnumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Olson v. CoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
- Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Hart v. City of Beverly HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Robins v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Personal Watercraft Coalition v. Marin County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.