Legal Opinion

People v. Central Pacific Railroad

California Supreme Court

Decided January 6, 1895No. 15600PublishedCited by 43 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

Action to recover the amount of taxes assessed against the defendant by the state board of equalization for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1888.

1. The underlying question upon this appeal is the validity of sections 3668 to 3670 of the Political Code, the appellant contending that the provisions of these sections contravene the provisions of section 25, article IV, of the constitution, and particularly of subdivision 10 thereof, by which the legislature is prohibited from passing a special law “ for the assessment or collection of taxes”; that as these sections take from the operation of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. California v. Central Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. City of Pasadena v. StimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Nichols v. WalterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1887
  4. Darcy v. Mayor of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  5. People v. Central Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. Agnew v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. County of Alameda v. JanssenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Martin v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API