Rode v. Siebe
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. Edward A. Belcher, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeatty, C. J.
The defendant is assessor of the city and county of San Francisco. The plaintiffs are residents of San Francisco, and in March, 1895, in response to defendant’s demand, made a return shoving that they were owners of personal property in said city and county subject to taxation for the ensuing fiscal year, but owned no real property. The defendant assessed their personal property, and on May 20, 1895, demanded payment of the tax, amounting, at the rate of the tax levy for the previous year, to seventy-one dollars and seventy-three cents, and threatened, in case of their refusal to pay, to…
2Cited by31 opinions
- The Title & Document Restoration Co. v. KerriganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
- People v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
- Delaney v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Deyoe v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Gaylord v. City of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.