In Re Gilstrap
California Supreme Court
APPLICATION originally made to the Supreme Court for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLawlor, J.
The petitioner presented his petition to this court for a writ of habeas corpus but before it was considered he interposed an amended petition and the pending writ was issued thereon. The amendment consists of allegations to the effect that petitioner had previously presented a similar petition to the superior court of Stanislaus County and that it was denied.
The amended petition sets forth that upon a complaint sworn to by S. P. Scott, inspector of the California state board of pharmacy, and filed in the justice’s court of Modesto township, county of Stanislaus, petitioner was arrested,…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Mugler v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- In Re KemmlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Butchers' Union Slaughter-House & Live-Stock Landing Co. v. Crescent City Live-Stock Landing & Slaughter-House Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. HumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- State Ex Rel. Baker v. UtechtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Graham v. KingwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- E. A. Hoffman Candy Co. v. City of Newport BeachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Coley v. WolcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.