Legal Opinion

Chavez v. Boise Cascade Corporation

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided April 18, 1989No. TC 86-0774-J-2; CA A43559; SC S35580PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*634LINDE, J.

After suffering an industrial accident at defendant’s plant, plaintiff obtained an award of 30 percent permanent partial disability from the Workers’ Compensation Board. Defendant refused plaintiffs demand for reinstatement in his former position pursuant to ORS 659.415, which makes it an unlawful employment practice to deny reinstatement to a worker who has sustained a compensable injury if the position is available “and the worker is not disabled from performing the duties of such position.” Defendant asserted that the Board’s finding of disability precluded plaintiff from claiming…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Convalescent Center of Bloomfield, Inc. v. Department of Income MaintenanceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. State v. RatliffOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  5. North Clackamas School Dist. v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Thomas Dodd Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  4. Barackman v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
  5. Stanich v. Precision Body and Paint, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API