Legal Opinion

Drews v. EBI Companies

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 11, 1990No. WCB 85-12763; CA A43657; SC S36174PublishedCited by 206 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFadeley, J.

The issue is whether either issue or claim preclusion applies in this case. An injured worker seeks correction of the amount of temporary total disability benefits (TTD) payable for periods when he was unable to work as a result of an injury. He also seeks a penalty and attorney fees because EBI Companies (EBI), the employer’s insurer, did not correct the amount of TTD payments within a reasonable time after EBI was notified of an error in the calculation of the amount of TTD due the worker. EBI asserts that claim preclusion prevents any recovery on account of the incorrect amount of TTD and,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Waterway Terminals Co. v. P. S. Lord Mechanical ContractorsOregon Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Rennie v. Freeway TransportOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Troutman v. ErlandsonOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  5. Brown v. Portland School District No. 1Oregon Supreme Court · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by206 opinions

  1. Ralph E. Thornton Cheryl A. Thornton v. City of St. Helens Warren Baker Brian LittleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  2. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Thomas Dodd Doris Dodd v. Hood River County, and State of Oregon, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
  5. Bloomfield v. WeaklandOregon Supreme Court · 2005

201 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API