Legal Opinion

State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Reuter

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1985No. CA A22866; SC S30777PublishedCited by 88 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, C. J.

This case involves collateral estoppel. “Collateral estoppel” is a term which describes these results: When an issue of ultimate fact has been determined by a valid and final judgment, that determination also settles the same issue in another action (a) between the same parties on a different claim, and (b) against persons who are so closely identified with a party that they are said to be “in privity” with parties to the earlier civil action.

Here, the dispute involves two parties, neither of whom was a party to the earlier litigation. 1 State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. (State Farm),…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Teitelbaum Furs, Inc. v. Dominion Ins. Co., Ltd.California Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Ruvolo v. American Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1963
  4. Bahler v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1970
  5. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Century Home Components, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by88 opinions

  1. D'Arata v. New York Central Mutual Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  3. Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  4. American Family Mutual Insurance v. SavickasIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. West Coast Theater Corp. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API