Legal Opinion
Barackman v. Anderson
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided September 5, 2007No. 90808315 A131326PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRosenblum, J.
This case is before us for the second time, following a remand by the Supreme Court to the trial court for further proceedings. At issue is whether a determination in arbitration between plaintiff, who was injured in an automobile accident, and her personal injury protection (PIP) insurance provider should have been given preclusive effect in a subsequent personal injury action between plaintiff and defendant, the driver of the other vehicle involved in the accident. On review for errors of law, we conclude that it should have and therefore reverse.
The material facts of this case are…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Century Home Components, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1976
- North Clackamas School Dist. v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Rueda v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1946
- North Clackamas School Dist. v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Thomas v. US Bank National AssociationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- Dauven v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2019
- Berg ex rel. Estate v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Patton v. Mut. of Enumclaw Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- Employment Departmet v. National Maintenance Contractors of Oregon, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.