State v. Ratliff
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.
We accepted review of this case to determine whether the defendant in the present criminal case may preclude the state from relitigating the issue of whether his stop and arrest were valid when an administrative hearings officer in the Motor Vehicles Division (DMV) had previously held the arrest and stop invalid. We hold that the procedure used in this type of administrative hearing provides an insufficient basis to allow the decision in that proceeding to collaterally estop an issue in a criminal case. We affirm the decision of the lower courts.
On October 18, 1984, defendant was stopped by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- State of Oregon v. DeweyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. GeorgeOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- State v. RatliffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
3Cited by53 opinions
- Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Reynolds v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999
- Pooler v. Motor Vehicles DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. LussierSupreme Court of Vermont · 2000
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.