Legal Opinion

Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 9, 1979No. 77-1305PublishedCited by 4,038 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

This case presents the question whether a party who has had issues of fact adjudicated adversely to it in an equitable action may be collaterally estopped from relitigating the same issues before a jury in a subsequent legal action brought against it by a new party.

The respondent brought this stockholder’s class action against the petitioners in a Federal District Court. The complaint alleged that the petitioners, Parklane Hosiery Co., Inc. (Parklane), and 13 of its officers, directors, and stockholders, had issued a materially false and misleading proxy statement in connection with a…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Commissioner v. SunnenSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Beacon Theatres, Inc. v. WestoverSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4,038 opinions

  1. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Brown v. FelsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996

4,033 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API