Legal Opinion
North Clackamas School Dist. v. White
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1988No. WCB 83-09151, CA A36411, SC S34192PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, C. J.
The question in this workers’ compensation case is whether the claimant’s assertion of a medical expenses claim and an aggravation claim are precluded by an earlier ruling of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board). The Court of Appeals held that the claims were precluded. North Clackamas School Dist. v. White, 85 Or App 560, 737 P2d 649 (1987). We hold that the claims are not precluded.
This case concerns rules commonly referred to as the rules of res judicata, long established in Oregon common law jurisprudence. The term “res judicata” has been used to refer to the preclusive effect on the…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Dean v. Exotic Veneers, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1975
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. ReuterOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Bahler v. FletcherOregon Supreme Court · 1970
- Taylor v. BakerOregon Supreme Court · 1977
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Drews v. EBI CompaniesOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Nelson v. Emerald People's Utility DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Eden Gate, Inc. v. D&L Excavating & Trucking, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2002
- North Clackamas School Dist. v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. DonovanOregon Supreme Court · 1988
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.