Legal Opinion

Doran v. City & County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court

Decided April 28, 1955No. Docket Nos. S.F. 19190, 19191PublishedCited by 44 opinions

Fitz-Gerald Ames, Sr., and Harold A. Galloway for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

This is a consolidated appeal by plaintiffs in two personal injury actions which were separately tried but which arose out of the same accident. It is submitted on two separate settled statements, which are substantially the same in their presentation of the evidence and are so treated by counsel for plaintiffs in discussing the legal points in the joint briefs presented on plaintiffs’ behalf. Plaintiff Doran appeals from an order granting a new trial after judgment in her favor. Plaintiff Bessette appeals from a judgment in favor of defendants.

In the Doran case the trial court instructed the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Shahinian v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Vlach v. WymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Miller v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958
  5. Miller v. Western Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API