Legal Opinion

Sills v. Los Angeles Transit Lines

California Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1953No. L. A. 22524PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff sought damages for injuries suffered when an automobile which he was driving was struck by a streetcar owned by the defendant transit company and operated by defendant Parker. The complaint alleged that the proximate cause of the collision was the negligent operation of the streetcar by defendants. Such charge of negligence was denied by defendants in their respective answers, and each specifically pleaded contributory negligence. The jury returned a verdict in favor of defendants. From the judgment accordingly entered, plaintiff appeals.

The principal question presented is whether…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Hansen v. Bear Film Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. People Ex Rel. Dept. of Public Works v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Phillips v. G. L. Truman Excavation Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Leo v. DunhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Wolfsmith v. MarshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API