Legal Opinion

Rodabaugh v. Tekus

California Supreme Court

Decided July 14, 1952No. L. A. 22246PublishedCited by 80 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiffs, the widow and adult sons of Andrew C. Rodabaugh, brought this action to recover damages for the latter’s death as a result of an automobile collision. Following the denial of defendant’s motion for a directed verdict, the jury returned a verdict in plaintiffs’ favor for $2,500. Defendant then moved for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The trial court granted this motion, and judgment was entered in defendant’s favor. On this appeal, plaintiffs challenge the correctness of this ruling.

Plaintiffs conceded in the trial court and now concede that the deceased was guilty of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Neel v. Mannings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Wallis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  5. Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by80 opinions

  1. Richards v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Hasson v. Ford Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Doran v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955

75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API