Shahinian v. McCormick
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment for defendants entered upon a jury verdict in an action for personal injuries suffered in a water skiing accident. Plaintiff alleges prejudicial error in the refusal of the trial judge to give certain instructions on the doctrines of res ipsa loquitur, assumption of risk, and last clear chance.
Defendants, Mr. and Mrs. McCormick, went water skiing with plaintiff Shahinian, and his wife, using the McCormicks’ newly acquired 16-foot outboard motorboat. The first day of skiing passed uneventfully. On the second day the two men decided to water ski in tandem, so…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Ybarra v. SpangardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Seneris v. HaasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Zentz v. Coca Cola Bottling Co.California Supreme Court · 1952
- Seffert v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
- Austin v. Riverside Portland Cement Co.California Supreme Court · 1955
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Avila v. Citrus Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental ServiceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Williams v. CarrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Vistica v. Presbyterian Hospital & Medical Center of San Francisco, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1967
- Grey v. Fibreboard Paper Products Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.