Brandelius v. City & County of San Francisco
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.
Plaintiffs appeal from an order granting defendants’ motion for a new trial in an action for alleged wrongful death. The order specifies that the new trial was granted “solely” because the court felt that “the jury was not properly instructed.” The propriety of the order therefore depends upon a determination of whether the trial court had correctly instructed the jury. The challenged instructions relate to the following subjects: (1) the degree of care required of a carrier with respect to an alighting passenger; (2) the presumption of due care in relation to the deceased’s conduct; and (3)…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Herbert v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1898
- Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Mazzotta v. Los Angeles Railway Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
- Thompson v. Los Angeles & San Diego Beach Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by123 opinions
- Shaw v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Treber v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Shahinian v. McCormickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Lamoreux v. San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
- Connolly v. Pre-Mixed Concrete Co.California Supreme Court · 1957
118 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.