Legal Opinion

Girdner v. Union Oil Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 9, 1932No. Docket No. Sac. 4686PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYLER, J., pro tem.

Appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff $5,000 for personal injuries and $500 damages to his' automobile, as the result of a collision between plaintiff’s automobile and an oil truck owned by defendant Union Oil Company, and driven by defendant Elam. The case was tried by the court sitting without a jury.

The sole question presented by the appeal is whether or not the facts in the case justify a recovery for plaintiff under the last clear chance doctrine. Appellant claims that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings and judgment. Primarily it may be stated…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Esrey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1894

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API