Girdner v. Union Oil Co.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
TYLER, J., pro tem.
Appeal from a judgment awarding plaintiff $5,000 for personal injuries and $500 damages to his' automobile, as the result of a collision between plaintiff’s automobile and an oil truck owned by defendant Union Oil Company, and driven by defendant Elam. The case was tried by the court sitting without a jury.
The sole question presented by the appeal is whether or not the facts in the case justify a recovery for plaintiff under the last clear chance doctrine. Appellant claims that the evidence is insufficient to support the findings and judgment. Primarily it may be stated…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Harrington v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Palmer v. TschudyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925
- Young v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1920
- Esrey v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by119 opinions
- Brandelius v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Daniels v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Rodabaugh v. TekusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Sills v. Los Angeles Transit LinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Selinsky v. OlsenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.