Legal Opinion
Parks v. BALDWIN PIANO AND ORGAN COMPANY
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 9, 1967No. Civ. 10408PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TIMBERS, Chief Judge.
QUESTIONS PRESENTED
The essential questions presented by defendants’ motions for summary judgment, pursuant to Rule 56, Fed.R.Civ. P., in this diversity action for breach of a piano dealer’s franchise contract, are whether the contract which was terminable at will was an enforceable agreement and, if so, whether termination and repossession of certain consigned goods were carried out in accordance with the contract.
The Court holds that the corporate defendant as a matter of law was entitled to terminate the contract upon the notice it gave and that the consigned goods were…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Ullmann v. MayOhio Supreme Court · 1947
- Blosser v. EnderlinOhio Supreme Court · 1925
- Skene v. CarayanisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Randolph v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
- Clark v. Auto Recovery Bureau Conn., Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
- MM Global Services, Inc. v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Western Geophysical Co. of America, Inc. v. Bolt Associates, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- In Re Greenwich Showboat Ltd. PartnershipUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.