Skene v. Carayanis
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.
The defendants’ appeal is based upon the denial of their motion to set the verdict aside and also upon errors they alleged to have been committed on the trial. The determination of the plaintiff’s right to recover as a matter of law upon the facts which she may rightfully claim to be supported by substantial evidence in the case, in reliance upon which the jury might reasonably have reached its conclusion, will go far to decide all the issues raised by the appeal. These facts may be summarized as follows: The plaintiff is a real-estate broker. The owners of a certain building, whom we shall…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Auburn Draying Co. v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Willner v. SilvermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1909
- Martell v. WhiteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
- Virtue v. Creamery Package Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Harris v. McPhersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1922
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by55 opinions
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Louis Kamm, Inc. v. FlinkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1934
- Blake v. LevySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Sportsmen's Boating Corp. v. HensleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Connecticut State Medical Society v. Connecticut Board of Examiners in PodiatrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.