Ullmann v. May
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
The decision of this case rests upon whether there is any unlawfulness or ambiguity in the provision of the agreement to the effect that commissions were to be paid only during the time that the agreement remained in full force and effect.
It is to be observed at the outset that the agreement here under review does not contemplate the sale of merchandise. It does involve the “sale” of the employer’s services to be performed for clients obtained by the salesman and paid for by such clients as billed by the employer and collected from the clients. Items (5) and (6) leave no doubt that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- The Ohio Crane Co. v. HicksOhio Supreme Court · 1924
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. BrewerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Singer Sewing MacH. Co. v. KaltwasserCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1923
3Cited by109 opinions
- Aultman Hospital Ass'n v. Community Mutual InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1989
- Weiper v. W.A. Hill & AssociatesOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
- McAfee, Inc. v. Agilysys, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010
- Debi Eyerman v. Mary Kay Cosmetics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
- Randolph v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.