Legal Opinion

Blosser v. Enderlin

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1925No. 18709PublishedCited by 87 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

It has been the claim of the defense that it is manifest from the provisions of the lease in question that the defendant is not the lessee therein, but that the United States government is the lessee, and hence that the defendant has no liability whatever to the plaintiff, growing out of the covenants or conditions of the lease, either for the payment of rentals or for damages caused to the premises during the term of such lease; or, if such conclusion is not justified by the terms of the lease in question, that its provisions are ambiguous and call for the application of the rule permitting…

2Cited by87 opinions

  1. Alexander v. Buckeye Pipe Line Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Westfield Insurance v. GalatisOhio Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Kelly v. Medical Life InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Long Beach Ass'n v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1998

82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API