Guaranty Trust Co. v. York
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Frankfurter
In Russell v. Todd, 309 U. S. 280, 294, we had “no occasion to consider the extent to which federal courts, in the exercise of the authority conferred upon them by Congress to administer equitable remedies, are bound to follow state statutes and decisions affecting those remedies.” The *100question thus carefully left open in Russell v. Todd is now before us. It arises under the following circumstances.
In May, 1930, Yan Sweringen Corporation issued notes to the amount of $30,000,000. Under an indenture of the same date, petitioner, Guaranty Trust Co., was named trustee with power and obligations…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1,745 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
1,740 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.