Legal Opinion
Clark v. Auto Recovery Bureau Conn., Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided September 27, 1994No. Civ. 5:91CV00294 (WWE)PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION
EGINTON, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff, Vallorie Clark, brought this action alleging that defendant, Auto Recovery Bureau Conn., Inc., repossessed her automobile in violation of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (“FDCPA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1692, and the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (“CUTPA”), Conn.Gen.Stat. § 42-110a-q. Plaintiff also alleges liability for common law conversion. The case was tried to the Court in July, 1994. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a), the Court enters the following findings of fact and conclusions of law.
I. FINDINGS OF FACT
Plaintiff and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- State v. IndrisanoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Venturi v. Savitt, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Jordan v. Kent Recovery Services, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1990
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. Union Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Eley v. Mid/East Acceptance Corp. of N.C., Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2005
- Charles Magley III v. M&W IncorporatedMichigan Court of Appeals · 2018
- Kerry A. Clarin Colleen v. Clarin v. Minnesota Repossessors, Inc., a Minnesota CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Aviles v. Wayside Auto Body, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Callaway v. WhittentonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.