Legal Opinion
Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. City of New London
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 19, 2003No. SC 16661PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The sole issue raised by this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC, has alleged facts sufficient to establish standing to bring this action against the defendants, the city of New London (city), the New London redevelopment agency (redevelopment agency), the New London Development Corporation (corporation) and the state department of economic and community development (department), seeking to bar them from, inter alia, implementing a municipal development plan (development plan) in the Fort Trumbull area of New London. The trial court, Hon. D.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Mystic Marinelife Aquarium, Inc. v. GillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Windels v. Environmental Protection CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Bellman v. Town of West HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
- Blass v. Rite Aid of Connecticut, Inc.Connecticut Superior Court · 2009
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.