Legal Opinion

City of Waterbury v. Town of Washington

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 2, 2002No. SC 16509PublishedCited by 119 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BORDEN, J.

The named plaintiff, the city of Waterbury (Waterbury), appeals1 and the named defendant, the town of Washington (Washington),2 cross *510appeals3 from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a court trial, granting a permanent injunction in favor of the defendants and enjoining Waterbury’s current operation of its water distribution system. In its appeal, Waterbury claims that the trial court improperly concluded that: (1) Waterbury violated the Connecticut Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), General Statutes § 22a-14 et seq.; (2) the relief granted under CEPA did not…

2Cases cited70 opinions

  1. McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. McCarthy v. MadiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. Hinchliffe v. American Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by119 opinions

  1. State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. State v. PeelerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  3. State v. SkakelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  4. Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. Ventres v. Goodspeed Airport, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005

114 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API