Legal Opinion
Windels v. Environmental Protection Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided October 30, 2007No. SC 17654PublishedCited by 60 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
The primary issue in this appeal 1 is whether the trial court properly determined that the plaintiffs, Richard Windels and Cecile Windels, 2 lacked standing under the Connecticut Environmental Protection Act of 1971 (CEPA), General Statutes § 22a-14 et seq., and the Inland Wetlands and Watercourses Act (IWWA), General Statutes § 22a-36 et seq., to bring this action against the defendants, the environmental protection commission of the town of Darien, the planning and zoning commission of the town of Darien, and Hart Investment Properties, LLC (Hart). 3 The plaintiffs…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pamela B. v. MentSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Adarand Constructors, Inc. v. SlaterSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Napoletano v. CIGNA Healthcare of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- Norma Faye Pyles Lynch Family Purpose LLC v. Putnam CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
- Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. OrrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Stuart v. StuartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Grady v. Town of SomersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.