Legal Opinion
Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. City of New London
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 3, 2007No. SC 17753PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
VERTEFEUILLE, J.
The primary issue in this appeal 1 is whether the trial court properly determined that the plaintiff, Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC, lacks standing under the Connecticut Environmental Protection Act (act), General Statutes § 22a-14 et seq., to bring this action against the defendants, the city of New London (city), the New London planning and zoning commission (commission), the New London Development Cor poration (corporation), the state department of economic and community development (department), and the state office of policy and management (office). The trial…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Maloney v. PacSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Spears v. GarciaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Tolly v. Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Burton v. COM'R OF ENV. PROTECTIONSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Andross v. Town of West HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- In Re Matthew F.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Stevenson Lumber Company-Suffield, Inc. v. Chase Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Pond View, LLC v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.