Legal Opinion
Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. Alves
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 1, 2008No. SC 17826PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ZARELLA, J.
The plaintiff, Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC, 1 appeals from the trial court’s judgment dismissing its action against the defendants city of New London (city) and the New London Development Corporation (development corporation), 2 for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The trial court determined that the plaintiffs second amended complaint, which was filed in response to the court’s order to revise the original complaint, failed to allege a colorable claim under General Statutes § 22a-16 of the Connecticut Environmental Protection Act (act). We conclude that the second…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. AlvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Millbrook Owners Ass'n v. Hamilton StandardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Nizzardo v. State Traffic CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Windels v. Environmental Protection CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Canty v. OttoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Brown and Brown, Inc. v. BlumenthalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Coleman v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. City of New LondonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.