Legal Opinion
Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. Alves
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 4, 2003No. SC 16667PublishedCited by 97 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SULLIVAN, C. J.
The issue to be resolved in this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC, has standing under General Statutes § 22a-161 to bring an action against the defendants to enjoin the demolition of thirty-nine buildings. The defendants are the New London Development Corporation (corporation), Antonio H. Alves, the New London building official, and the city of New London (city). The trial court, Hon. D. Michael Hurley, judge trial referee, granted the defendants’ motions to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and rendered judgment…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Novametrix Medical Systems, Inc. v. BOC Group, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- RK Constructors, Inc. v. Fusco Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Faulkner v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- City of Waterbury v. Town of WashingtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by97 opinions
- Cordiano v. Metacon Gun Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Moore v. City of MiddletownOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Gold v. RowlandSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Windels v. Environmental Protection CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Eder Bros. v. Wine Merchants of Connecticut, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
92 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.