Legal Opinion
Heady v. Zoning Board of Appeals
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 3, 1953PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
The defendant zoning board of appeals granted a variance of the zoning regulations in favor of the defendant Viola. The plaintiff, an adjoining property owner, appealed to the Court of Common Pleas. That court directed that judgment be entered sustaining her appeal. The defendant Viola has appealed from the judgment.
The finding is not subject to correction. It discloses the following facts: The plaintiff owns and resides in a dwelling house located on Cherry Street in Milford. The defendant Viola owns a dwelling house next door and to the east. Both properties are in a residence A zone, which…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Grady v. KatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
- Beard's Appeal from County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Chudnov v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Kamerman v. LeroySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Pleasant View Farms Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.