Legal Opinion
Kamerman v. Leroy
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 8, 1946PublishedCited by 48 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.
The application of Sebastian Miaño for permission to operate a liquor package store in a business zone in Hartford, brought directly to the zoning hoard of appeals, was granted by unanimous vote on the ground that it was not detrimental to public health and safety, and the remonstrants appealed. The Court of Common Pleas sustained the appeal, holding that the action of the hoard was unlawful, arbitrary and in abuse of its discretion.
Package stores in business zones are permitted only in accordance with § 204.2 of the Hartford zoning ordinances. § 201 (y). Section 204.2, as amended, forbids…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Thayer v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Devaney v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1946
- Beard's Appeal from County CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Fitzgerald v. Merard Holding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Blake v. Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
- Krejpcio v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
- Mendelsohn v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Pleasant View Farms Development, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Holt v. WissingerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.