Legal Opinion
Dooley v. Town Plan & Zoning Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 21, 1964No. 78978; 79000; 79219; 79251PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShea, J.
In February, 1961, the defendant, after notice and hearing, amended the zoning regulations of Fairfield by creating a new zone called flood plain district. Thereafter, the defendant changed the zonal classification of an area of about 404 acres from residence B to flood plain district. In the first case, the plaintiff, Frank J. Dooley, both owns and is under a contract of May, 1960, to purchase from Catherine A. Nemesky land which is within the area covered by this change of zone. In the second case, the plaintiffs, Thomas J. Carroll, Patrick L. Carroll, Jr., and Frank W. Carroll, are the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
- La Salle National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 1957
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount VernonNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- State v. HillmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Just v. Marinette CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
- Adolphson v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1985
- Smith v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Turnpike Realty Co. v. Town of DedhamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.